Suchergebnisse

The main topic of this article is the impact of Brexit on eu's cooperation on security and defence. The British government has indicated that the uk as an important international actor wants to maintain a leading role promoting European security. nato remains in the uk perspective the most important forum for that. But since the Euro Atlantic organisation does not cover all aspects of European security, new forms of cooperation between the eu and Britain after Brexit have to be explored since both share the same ideas about a rules based international order and have common interests in maintaining security on the continent.

The forty-year anniversary of the Helsinki Agreements on which the existing formal security arrangements of Europe are based, could have led to a convivial party. In reality the opposite is actually the case. The European safety relations in 2015 look now on course for another long-lasting conflict between East and West. There is little time to celebrate .1

This paper discusses the failures of the European security agenda against Putin's Russia. It describes how after WWII the world believed in and worked on multilateral cooperation and consultation and how Europe in particular was therefore convinced that peace and security policies should be conducted with soft powers. The remainder of the article then proposes the two pillars on which a new security agenda should be based: multilateralism combined with a deterrent defense. The contribution ends with an epilogue explaining how Russian restitution payments to Ukraine can be made possible.